The
article I’m going to analyze, is taken from The Telegraph and is entitled "Becoming Picasso: Paris 1901, Courtauld Gallery, review." It was published by
Alastair Sooke on 19th February, 2013.
A
lot of comments are carried here on Pablo Picasso’s works, displayed at the
Courtauld Gallery in London as part of the exhibition named Paris 1901. The
author begins his review with describing the artist’s self-portrait where,
according to Alastair Sooke, the painter appears
incandescent, a fireball of inspiration and cocksure ambition burning against a
background as dark as outer space – and so he actually was,
having illuminated the 20th century like
a comet.
By the way, it’s exactly because the canvas was painted in Paris in 1901, the
whole exhibition was given that name.
Speaking
of Picasso’s works of that period, occupying the first room at the Courtauld, there’s
clear evidence that the artist was deeply influenced
by contemporary French painters: swirling
forms and sickly, ghoulish light of French Can-Can, for instance, recall the
posters and paintings of Toulouse-Lautrec. In addition, Picasso’s Dwarf-Dancer (La Nana) – a
young dwarf wearing a tutu, irradiated by a light show
of
spectacular painterly effects – is
surely an impudent riposte to Degas’s paintings of ballerinas.
In
the second room of the gallery, however, it becomes evident to Mr. Sooke that
later Picasso’s style began to coalesce into his so-called Blue
Period. There’s every likelihood that the renowned artist changed the appearance of his paintings — moving away from energetic,
broken brushwork even though this had won him admiring critical attention. Thus, this shift can strongly
be sensed in a complex composition called
The Blue Room, presenting a naked woman bathing in a
bedroom:
the mood of this painting is much more melancholic, that is quite unusual
for the artist’s previous works. Speaking of the situation in whole, it’s
necessary to note that Picasso developed this new
look
in the late summer of 1901, so that he favoured more monumental
forms and extensive planes of colour. For instance, one of his
most famous works, Absinthe Drinker, represents a woman who embraces herself with monstrously
elongated arms and hands, like prey slowly being crushed to death by the
pythonic coils of introspection and depression. There’s every reason to
believe that in paintings of café drinkers like this Picasso was at last fashioning his own distinctive artistic identity.
In
conclusion the author states that the
narrative of this exhibition is
one of the most exciting stories that can be told about the life of any major
artist – of breakthrough, and suggests not missing
the chance to visit it. As for me, I’m not fond of Picasso’s works, as well as all
these experiments in the sphere of art; nevertheless, I would accept this offer
if I were asked, as one should take every opportunity to get acquainted with
famous painters’ works, no matter whether you like them or not.
GOOD!
ReplyDeleteNo slips, which is rare!
Try to sum up and paraphrase!